Yeah, computers have a hard time being "creative." However, that may depend upon your definition of what it means to be creative. The human mind, as another kind of complex machine, could be said to work within a set of rules (music theory for example) to produce something that others find aesthetically pleasing because of humanity's shared participation in this set of rules, this structure, as the context in which creations are created. If that mumbo jumbo makes any sense...
And this computer is playing by its own set of rules regarding what kind of structure and choices are pleasing to it. Its music theory believes that sounds that are statistically more different in a moment of time are more pleasing to its ear than other sounds. It makes a qualitative choice regarding which sounds to use (in our view it's quantitative, but the computer doesn't know any difference...so quantity = quality in its limited perception).
The computer's idea of structure is surely different than our own. It doesn't compose with a beginning, middle, end in mind...but why do we do that? I've always been fascinated by musical and narrative structures and why they have evolved to their current state. I believe it has something to do with the organism (humans) that create that causes specific kinds of structure. Perhaps something to do with natural biological rhythms. Consequently, if the computer could be considered its own creative entity, as a different type of creature, it will likely have a different sense of appropriate creative structure for its art.
So, in short, I think it depends upon your frame of reference, regarding whether you believe the computer is being creative or not.
Holy shit. I didn't intend to write that much. Oh well...I hope my academic ramblings weren't too boring. And, in the end, yeah...it's a computer doing it's job. Not truly creative in the usual human sense.
no subject
And this computer is playing by its own set of rules regarding what kind of structure and choices are pleasing to it. Its music theory believes that sounds that are statistically more different in a moment of time are more pleasing to its ear than other sounds. It makes a qualitative choice regarding which sounds to use (in our view it's quantitative, but the computer doesn't know any difference...so quantity = quality in its limited perception).
The computer's idea of structure is surely different than our own. It doesn't compose with a beginning, middle, end in mind...but why do we do that? I've always been fascinated by musical and narrative structures and why they have evolved to their current state. I believe it has something to do with the organism (humans) that create that causes specific kinds of structure. Perhaps something to do with natural biological rhythms. Consequently, if the computer could be considered its own creative entity, as a different type of creature, it will likely have a different sense of appropriate creative structure for its art.
So, in short, I think it depends upon your frame of reference, regarding whether you believe the computer is being creative or not.
Holy shit. I didn't intend to write that much. Oh well...I hope my academic ramblings weren't too boring. And, in the end, yeah...it's a computer doing it's job. Not truly creative in the usual human sense.