realexplodingcat: (Default)
explodingcat ([personal profile] realexplodingcat) wrote2007-12-11 09:34 pm

Parental Observation Of The Day

It's a good thing babies have armpits. Otherwise, they'd slip right out of your hands every time you try to pick them up.
ext_5237: (Default)

[identity profile] chorus-of-chaos.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 02:56 am (UTC)(link)
not if you hang onto the ankles.

just kidding :P

[identity profile] explodingcat.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
LOL. That's fantastic. And good advice.

[identity profile] lightning-rose.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)

I was thinking much the same thing. :)

When I worked at the chicken factory, the Ones That Almost Got Away were usually caught by some poor sod wielding a long pole with a V shaped hook on the end. The poor chicken was caught by the ankle and dragged to it's doom.

I was thinking something similar might work with lobster sproglets. ;)

[identity profile] explodingcat.livejournal.com 2007-12-13 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
I'll keep that in mind for when I start my mechanically separated baby business.

[identity profile] lightning-rose.livejournal.com 2007-12-14 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)

I'm still searching for 100% pure Baby Oil. That Johnson & Johnson crap doesn't have a single drop of baby in it.

[identity profile] explodingcat.livejournal.com 2007-12-14 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
You'll just have to squeeze your own.
ext_5237: (Default)

[identity profile] chorus-of-chaos.livejournal.com 2007-12-14 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
actually, it was my chicken catching days that made me think of it. You'd dive for the damn thing and either try to land on it or shoot out an arm and catch the damn things leg and then pin it down before it pecked/flogged you to death.

[identity profile] lightning-rose.livejournal.com 2007-12-14 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)

You have my sympathies. It was bad enough dealing with the partially eviscerated ones.

[identity profile] eilonwy.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
That's why they make 'em that way, innit?

[identity profile] explodingcat.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
I was kinda thinking they were for holding two bambino size scoops of ice cream. Maybe not.

[identity profile] explodingcat.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
Is that some kind of abbreviated 'net speak for Babies With Armpits Have Arms?

[identity profile] oceanic.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 12:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. Yes it is.
Which makes most of the times I've used BWAHA to reply to an LJ comment a complete non-sequitur...

Armpits!

[identity profile] praxisloki.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
That's what I've been doing wrong all these years.

[identity profile] blixa23.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
The same can ALMOST be applied with adults.

But the full nelson is a bit more effective.

[identity profile] explodingcat.livejournal.com 2007-12-12 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Armpits are essential for the full nelson. Can it be applied to someone without a head though?

[identity profile] blixa23.livejournal.com 2007-12-13 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. However, in extreme cases (as if not having a head is extreme enough), it ends up becoming the Heimlich Maneuver.